It's difficult to tell what ancient creatures' lives resembled—in any event, responding to apparently straightforward inquiries, similar to what they ate, can be a test. At times, scientistss luck out, and perfect fossils will safeguard a creature's stomach substance or give different insights. In another examination in Frontiers in Earth Science, analysts exploring the fossil of a flying creature that lived close by the dinosaurs got a greater number of inquiries than answers when they discovered quartz precious stones in the fowl's stomach.
"I would say it's some sort of odd type of delicate tissue conservation that we've never seen," says Jingmai O'Connor, the partner caretaker of fossil reptiles at Chicago's Field Museum. "Sorting out what's in this current winged animal's stomach can assist us with understanding what it ate and which job it played in its environment."
"This paper reveals to us that the Enantiornithes, one significant clade of fossil fowls, actually have no immediate stomach follows or proof," says Shumin Liu, an understudy at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the paper's first creator. "I was energized, it is an achievement about them."
The fossil winged creature the scientists zeroed in on is an example of Bohaiornis guoi. "They're essential for an early ancestry of feathered creatures from the Cretaceous, around 120 million years prior," says O'Connor, who dealt with the paper while at IVPP, where Liu was her Master's understudy. "They actually hold teeth and hooks on their hands, however they're little, about the size of a pigeon, so they're not especially frightening." Bohaiornis was essential for a gathering called the enantiornithines that were previously the world's most basic fowls; a large number of enantiornithine examples have been found in northeastern China's Jehol Group stores.
Notwithstanding the immense number of finely safeguarded enantiornithines, none have been protected with hints of food in their stomachs that could mention to specialists what these winged animals ate. "We can recognize the eating regimen and recreate the stomach related framework for all these different gatherings of fowls found in the stores that record the Jehol Biota, with the exception of the enantiornithines, despite the fact that you have more enantiornithines than some other gathering," says O'Connor. "For these folks, we have no examples or safeguarded proof of diet, which is truly odd." In the example O'Connor and her partners inspected in this new paper, however, there was a piece of information: a past report brought up the presence of little shakes in its stomach.
Many living winged creatures have an organ called a gizzard—a thick, strong piece of the stomach causes them digest food. They swallow little shakes, called gizzard stones, and these stones advance toward the gizzard, where they help to squash up extreme food. These gizzard stones, called gastroliths, have been found in some dinosaur and fowl fossils, giving hints about what those creatures ate—they've been related with diets of extreme plant materials and seeds.
Yet, rocks in a creature's stomach aren't really a sign that it's utilizing them to smash up food. Some cutting edge feathered creatures of prey swallow rocks called rangle to help unstick matter from their stomach related lot to wipe it out. What's more, now and then, rocks have been found close to the stomach holes of dinosaur fossils that the animal gulped unintentionally, or the stones were only fortuitously close to the fossil. "You need to make a separation between a gastrolith and a gastrolith that is utilized as a gizzard stone," says O'Connor.
While there's no unmistakable proof of gastroliths in the enantiornithine feathered creatures, a paper distributed in 2015 set that an example of Bohaiornis guoi contained rocks in its stomach utilized as rangle (gastroliths ingested by raptorial winged animals to clean the stomach, however not to process food). O'Connor was wary; the photographs of the stones didn't look right. Gastroliths are generally made of various types of rock and are somewhat various tones and shapes; these stones were all comparable in organization to one another and to the fossilized bone itself. They likewise didn't appear to be formed or assembled very right—they were excessively round and excessively dissipated. "I didn't have the foggiest idea what they were, yet I resembled, they're not gastroliths," she says. Thus, she and her associates set out to sort out what these stones were and contrast them and gastroliths from other fossil flying creatures and dinosaurs.
The specialists removed an example of the stones in Bohaiornis' stomach and analyzed them under a filtering electron magnifying lens. They at that point presented the stones to X-beams to figure out which frequencies the stones assimilated. Since every mineral ingests various frequencies, this aided the specialists tight down what these stones were made of.
"We found that those bits of rock that had been called gastroliths were chalcedony precious stones," says O'Connor. "Chalcedony is fundamentally quartz gems that fill in sedimentary rocks. There hasn't been any proof of this in the Jehol yet there's a lot of proof of it inside the fossil record where chalcedony precious stones will shape inside a clamshell, or now and again chalcedony will supplant the minerals making up the bones in a fossil." What's more, the chalcedony was totally interconnected in one flimsy sheet of gem, as opposed to isolate rocks that the flying creature had gulped.
The measure of chalcedony present wasn't right, as well, in the event that it were utilized to assist with absorption. Logical writing proposes that the stones that flying creatures burn-through as rangle represent about 3% of their weight; since Bohaiornis was likely around 300 grams, the group would be searching for as much as 9 grams worth of rangle. O'Connor says, "We couldn't extricate the whole example and sort out the amount it gauged, yet Shumin was truly shrewd, and she took a piece of chalcedony that gauged 3 grams, and it was immense" — route greater than the consolidated size of the pieces of chalcedony in Bohaiornis' stomach.
The joined proof proposes that Bohaiornis didn't have gastroliths for aiding squash food or rangle to help clear out its stomach all things considered. Or on the other hand, in any event, this example of Bohaiornis doesn't contain those gastroliths.
"We simply have this shortfall of proof, and scientistss consistently say nonattendance of proof isn't proof of nonappearance. In any case, I in every case counter with, whoever concocted that saying never envisioned having a great many examples that are finished and verbalized, some saving delicate tissue," says O'Connor. In the event that Early Cretaceous enantiornithines utilized gastroliths, it's terribly odd that none of the large number of fossils show them.
O'Connor takes note of that while none of the enantiornithine fowls from the Jehol Formation show proof of stomach substance, there's one from Spain with pieces of freshwater shellfish in its stomach. However, the secret of what Bohaiornis ate, and why none of the Jehol enantiornithines have anything in their stomachs, remains.
"This investigation is significant on the grounds that this fossil is the unparalleled fossil record of Enantiornithes containing conceivable gastroliths, even conceivable genuine stomach follows in the Jehol. Also, just this clade of fossil winged animals don't have stomach follows up until now, though most different clades have these follows," says Liu.
"We're continually attempting to discover some proof, and the examples that have been proposed to fill this hole just sadly don't do it," says O'Connor. "It's simply important for the paleo game, a piece of science—continually amending. I'm glad when we don't get things, since it implies there's exploration to do, it's energizing."
Больше интересных статей здесь: Новости науки и техники.